Ramavath Had Lal, v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.40743 OF 2016 ORDER:

The writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the second respondent in registering the crime being F.I.R.No.191 of 2016 on the file of the second respondent against the petitioners as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently, to quash the same. Heard and perused the material.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present crime for the offences under Sections 420 and 409 IPC, and that the petitioners have not committed any offence. Hence, the learned counsel prays this Court to quash the proceedings against the petitioners herein.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings against the petitioners. However, taking into consideration the fact that the dispute is arising out of supply of rice, the second respondent is directed to complete the investigation without arresting the petitioners and file final report, if any, in accordance with law. The petitioners are directed to appear before the second respondent and execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) each with one surety for the likesum each for their future appearance for the purpose of investigation.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any shall also stand disposed of. _____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 24.11.2016 pln