R. Madhumohan Reddy v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep.By Its Principal
t 325s I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION TR NO: 2481 OF 2017 Between:
R. Madhumohan Reddy, S/o Venkat Reddy age 57 years, working as Additional Superantendent of Police, Medak, Medak District. R/o Medak ...PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by its Principal, Secretary. Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-500 022.
The Government of Telangana rep.by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Hyderabad-500 022.
The Director General of Police A.P.Hyderabad., The Director General of Police, Telangana / Hyderabad.,
5. Mr.C.Narotham Reddy s/o and age not known, Addl. S.P. O/o D.G.P Lakdikapul, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the impugned action of the respondents in not including/excluding the name of the applicant in the provisional senrority list of Deputy Superintendents of Police (Civil) fit for promotion to the category of Addl. Superintendents of police issued vide G. O. Ms.No.112 Home (Ser.l)Department d1.14.7.2014 and further taking steps co revert him from the present post as illegal, arbitrary and the one having for reaching adverse affect on his career and further also subject him to mental agony working under his juniors and consequently direct the Respondents to include the name of the applicant in the seniority list of Oeputy Sup6rlntendenta of Police(Civil) flt for promotion to the category of
Addl. Superintendents of Police at an appropriate place above the name of his Junior Sri C.Narotham Reddy Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K RAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRII'I'ETITION (TR) No. 2481 OF 2017
ORDER
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel For the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded to the same. 2.
Recording the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous.
3.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
SD/-8. CHANDRA PRAKASH ASSISTANIAEGISTRAR //TRUE copy// (rh SECTIffi oFFIcER
1. One CC to Sri K Ram Reddy, Advocate tOpUCI
2. Two CCs to GP for Services, Hign Court ior the'State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies TJ BS rQg To, I
HIGH COURT DATED:24101t2023 1 $E STA ,{
ORDER
ct (i d 17 HAH 2123 WP(TR).No.2481 of 2017 I ,.
DtsMtsstNc THE WR|T PETTTTON (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
Oeuo.x\D