N.Siddulanaidu v. The Government Of A.P., Rep.Byits Principle Secretary

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT W.P.No.2050 OF 2011 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Government Pleader. The writ petition was taken up for hearing on 26.02.2015 and the petitioner by placing reliance upon DANDU TRINADHA RAJU AND OTHERS V. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM AND OTHERS and RAMDAS RAMANNA AND OTHERS V. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, ENERGY DEPARTMENT (PR.II) AND OTHERS contends that as possession is not taken, the dispense with enquiry under Section 5-A by invoking power under Section 17(a) of the Land Acquisition Act is illegal. At request of learned Government Pleader, the writ petition was adjourned to this day to enable him to get instructions as to whether possession of acquired land in Sy.No.878-1B of Kaligiri Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District was taken or not.

The learned Government Pleader places before the Court the written instructions dated 04.03.2015 received from the office of Revenue Divisional Officer, Kavali. The instructions are to the effect that the urgency clause was invoked and possession of the land could not be taken for want of budget provision to pay compensation to land owners.

In view of this admitted position, the learned Government Pleader submits that the legal objection raised by the petitioner is covered by the above decisions. The writ petition is, accordingly, ordered. Section 6 declaration dated 06.10.2009 is set aside and the respondents are given liberty to proceed in the matter in accordance with law by conducting enquiry under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act and proceed further in the acquisition proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________ S.V.BHATT, J 25th March, 2015

Lrkm