High Court for State of TelanganaWP(TR)/4205/2017dismissed as infructuous

R Uma Devi v. The District Educational Officer

2023-02-22N.V.Shravan Kumar3 pages

[ 32ss ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOUR^ABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRlT PETITION (TR) NO: 4205 OF 2017 Between:

R Uma Devi, Wo. Thathvananda Chary, Aged about 30 years, S.G.T., Primary School, Meesala Thanda, Yacharam Mandal Rangareddy District. Rl/o. Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER AND

1. The District Educational officer, Rangareddy District, Hyderabad-4

2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. 500004.

3. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad-500 022- ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare that the applicant is entitled for 10 entitlement points under spouse category in terms of Rule 6 (ll) O of the Transfer Rules issued in G.O,Ms. No. 12, dated 16-6-2015 with all consequential benefits by holding the action of the respondents in not awarding 10 entitlement points under spouse grounds to the applicant on the untenable ground that the applicant and her husband are working in separate districts which is illegal, arbitrary, unjust. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D BALA KISHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4205 OF 2017 I ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded to the same. 2.

Recording the submissions made by learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs ASSrsrAij-/R[dS+S^t //TRUE COPYII L-ur SECT.I6N OFFICER To, One CC to Sri. D Bala Kishan Rao, Advocate TOPUCI Two CCs to GP for Services, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUTI Two CD Copies TJ SW \ \"-

HIGH COURT DATED:2210212023 1EL4 ,s -,, , r\ \

ORDER

WP(TR).No.4205 of 2017 DtsMtsstNc THE WR|T PET|T|ON (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

6 6u\ :.-- Sl-,) OL 6S/r=