S. Mattapally, v. The District Collector,
t 3300I IN T}IE HIGH COURT FoR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT , THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 33781 OF 2018 Between:
S. Mattapally, S/o. Appaiah, Aged about 57 years, Occ. ADC, E.No.108991, R/o. Plot No.SB, Hayathnagar, Raghavendra Colony, Near RTC Depot, Hyderabad' Telangana State ...pETrroNER AND The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. The Tahsildar, Narketpally Mandal, Narketpally, Nalgonda Distirct. T.S.R.T.C., rep. by its Regional Manager Hyderabad Region, M.G.B.S, Hyderabad.
The Depot Manager, T.S.R.T.C., Hayatnagar-l Depot, Hyderabad. The Joint Director (V & S) T.S.R.T.C.., Bus Bhavan, Musheerabad, HYderabad'
...RESP.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing proceedings vide Lr.No.C/61112018, dt. 11.05.20't8 and charge sheet vide proceeding No. P3/255(2)/2018-HYT-1, dated 11.07.20'18 issued by the 4th respondent is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently set aside the same and to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits to the petitioner.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the suspension order vide proceeding No. P3/255(2)/2018- HYT-|, dated 11.07.2018 issued by the 4th respondent pending disposal of Writ Petition.
zt' ,/ lA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section '15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the charge sheet vide proceeding No.P3l255(2)12018-HYT-1, dated 1 1.07.2018 issued by the 4th respondent pending disposal of Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURENDRA DESAI Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 TO 5: - The Court made the following: ORDER
// ,,/ HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.33781 OF 2O18 ORAL ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition. He had made the endorsement to the said effect on the bundle.
2. Granting liberty as sought for, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed. SD/-A. SRINIVASA REDDY AS T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// S CTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI SURENDRA DESAI, Advocate [OPUC] i. iil ca"'io-Gi FOR dEVENUE, Hi'gh court foi the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]
3. Two CD Copies PSK.
BSv I It
HIGH COURT NBK,J DATED:2411212024
ORDER
WP.No.33781 of 2018 IHE SIi .r k oo 2 0 rEB 2025 DFgpa16,,.r'''- i DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS I I @ le x( I