Itikyala Kiran Kumar v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14051 OF 2017 ORDER:

The case of the petitioners is that their father holding total extent of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.319-86 cents as mentioned in writ affidavit in various survey numbers of Itikala Village, Gajwel Revenue Division. The original authority under land Reforms Act declared that the father of the petitioners is holding 3.0605 S.H. as excess. Aggrieved by the same, the father of the petitioners preferred appeal before the Land Reforms Tribunal, Medak District vide Appeal No.C.C.No.G/978/75, dated 22-06-1984 and the appellate authority modified the original authorities to the extent declaring that 0.3701 SH is excess by deleting the shares of other family members vide order dated 22-06-1984.

Thereafter the land to an extent of Ac.18-51 cents in Sy.No.358 was surrendered to the Government. Though the land was surrendered, the concerned officials failed to remove their lands from ceiling lands and the same entries are continuing as on date. On that the petitioners represented to the respondents several times for correction of entries on 10-12-2012 and 22-10-2013 and also 20-03-2017, but no orders are passed on the same. When the petitioners approached the respondent No.3 for correction of entries and submitted representation. Inspite of the same, no steps were taken at once in the year 1989-90, respondent No.3-

authorities endorsed in the original ROR book that entry was reverted but the same was not implemented in any of records for the reasons best known to them. Taking advantage of entries of ceiling lands, third parties are encroaching into the lands of the petitioners and the Government is also proposing to allot the same to third parties. Aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents in taking steps for correction of entries as per the orders of Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, the present writ petition is filed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 20-03-2017 filed by the petitioners for correction of entries as per the orders of Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal in C.C.No.G/978/75, dated 22-06-1984 in accordance with law and pass orders and thereafter take necessary action as expeditiously as possible.

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to the disposal of this petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J 19-04-2017 Nvl