← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/45873/2022closed no costs

Boni Srinivasu v. The State Of Telangana

2022-12-30B.Vijaysen Reddy5 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

[ 3183 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 45873 OF 2022 Between:

Boni Srinivasu, S/o B.Ch.Suryanarayana, Occ Business, R/o Flat No. 103, Padmaraga Apartments, Balaji Swarnapuri Colony, Mothinagar, Hyderabad500018. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Station House Officer, Gachibowli, Rangareddy District.

3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Serilingampally Mandal, Rangareddy Dist.

4. The Greater Hyderabad Muncipal Corporation, Rep. by its Municipal Commissioner, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R. District.

5. Rajendra Colony A & B Blocks Welfare Association, Regd. No. 203 of 2018, Kondapur, Hyderabad-84 Rangareddy District, Telangana State. Rep By its President ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2 to 4 in interfering with peaceful possession of the property bearing Plot 337, Type-B, in Sy. No. 75, admeasuring 300 sq. yards, or 250.80 sq.mts., situated at Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal and Municipality, Rangareddy District is illegal, arbitrtary and against the principles of natural justice and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court;

lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr;urrr:, tances stated in the affidavit filed in :upport of the petition, the High Court nr.: y b,: pleased to direct the Responde rts l,lo. 2 to 4 not to interfere in the p( tilionr:r's peaceful possession of the pr, rperty bearing Plot 337, Type-8, in Sy l"lc. ,'5, admeasuring 300 sq. yards, or 2:0.80 sq.mts., situated at Kondapur Villag e Serilingampally Mandal and Municip. rlity, Rangareddy District, pending disp,rs al of the main writ petition;

Counsel for the Peti ioner: SRl. V T KALYAN Counsel for the Res rondents Rl & R2: AGP FOR HOME The Court made the lollowing: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION 0.45873 0F 2022 ORDER: (ORAL) This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 in interfering with the peaceful possession of the property bearing Plot No.337, Type-B, admeasuring 300 sq. yards or 250.80 sq. meters, situated at Kondapur Village, Serilingampally lvlandal and Municipality, Ranga Reddy District 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned I t Assistant Government Pleader for Home, and perused the material available on record.

3.

Based on the written instructions daled 28.12.2022 issued by the Sub-lnspector of Police, Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, the learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that respondent No.2 is no way concerned with the subject property. As on today, no one has lodged a complaint against the petitioner and there is no crime registered in the police station of respondent No.2. Further, it is stated that respondent No.2 never interfered in the civil disputes of the petitioner over the subject property.

4.

Learned :ounsel for the petitioner submits Ihirt in view of the statement of res ponrlent No.2 that there is no crime re,3istered against the petitioner e rd lhere is no interference from ther police in any manner, approp iate orders be passed.

5.

ln view oi the above, the writ petition is closeC. lf the petitioner has any fu(her grievance, he is at liberty to approa:lr this Court at later point of tim, r.

As a sequ, rl th,ereto, miscellaneous applications i1' any, pending in the writ petitio r starnd closed. No order as to costs SII/.T.JAYASREE ASSI-TiTANT REGISTRAR 'i!-- /iTRUE COPY'

SiEC TION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. V T KALYAN Advocate tOpUCl

2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State c,f --etangana, Hyderabad. [OL Tl

3. Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT BVRJ DATED: 30112t2022 E s TA .i1- /;

,,:illc I g J[ii ?u3

ORDER

WP.No.4587i of 2022 WRIT PETITII)N IS CLOSED OF WITHOIUI COST