R.Venkata Ramana, v. The Registrar,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.5817 of 2013 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

"To issue a writ or direction more particularly oin the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner though there are vacancies and the petitioner are fully eligible and qualified for being reengaged, as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory high handed, and cannot be justified in the eye of law and consequently direct the respondent to reengage the petitioners in the existing vacancies with all consequential benefits in the interest of justice".

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.Srinivasa Baba, learned Standing Counsel for Respondents.

3. When the matter is taken up, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that for redressal of the grievance of the petitioner, petitioner herein submitted a representation dated 16.11.2012 to the 2nd respondent and no order has passed on the said representation and a necessary direction may be issued to the 2nd respondent to pass appropriate orders on the said representation, in accordance with law, by fixing some time frame.

4. Recording the said submission and having regard to the nature of controversy, writ petition is disposed of, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the matter and entitlement of the petitioner, directing the 2nd respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 16.11.2012 said to have been submitted by the petitioner herein, in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As a sequel, the

miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date: 13.4.2016 DA THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI W.P.No.5817 of 2013

13.4.2016 DA