Md. Asad, E 209300, v. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation,

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 38172 oF 2016 Between:

Md. Asad, E 209300, TSRTC Driver, Dilsuknagar depot, Dilsuknagar, Hyderabad. AND ...PET|T|ONER

1. Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Rep by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

2. The Chief Medical Officer, TSRTC, Taranaka, Hyderabad.

3. The Regional Manager, TSRTC, MGBS, 1stfloor, Hyderabad.

4. The Depot Manager, TSRTC, Dilsuknagar Depot, Dilsuknagar, Hyderabad. .

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying.

that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or directions more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in utilizing the petitioner services as Driver on Passengers transport Bus on road instead of Shift parking duties driver as per order dated 28-6-2010 of the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and set-aside the same including proceedings of the 3rd respondent NO L41785(41112016-HR, dated 16-9-2016 in not considering the claim of the petitioner for proving light duties as parking Driver in the interest of corporation, passengers and Public and further direct the respondents herein to provide any suitable light duties to the petitioner in the interest of petitioner health, corporation and for the interest of passengers and public l.

A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP.

duties as per the directions of the 1st respondent dated; 28-6-2010 in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. P. GOVINDA RAJULU Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. THOOM SRINIVAS (SC FOR TSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER I l

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENfVAS RAO Writ Petition No-38172 ol 2OL6 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for consideration, Sri P.Govinda Rajulu, learned counsel for tlle petitioner fairly submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent Corporation considered the claim of the petitioner and provided an alternative emplo5zment as Shramik from the post of driver vide order dated 19.O4.2O | 8 after conducting medical examination. 2.

[n view of the above submission, the grievance of the petitioner is resolved and no further adjudication is required.

3.

Accordingl_v, the Writ Petition is closed. No costs.

Pending rniscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed sD/- K.SREERAMA MURTHY / ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, . 3ffi 33 3 3# I f* 33J' U Rfl, ffitY t 3 c1'dE?34?3 l' ?3 " "r Two CD CoPies BM SB

HIGH COURT DATED:1 1l09t2O2S ,.,4-. :\':.. 9r4T€ rJ ns rcl M ii , ..,i/ -,// \,.

'.::

-:-

ORDER

WP.No.38172 ot 2016 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS @('a'8 9." .

;-"h\r, :

I I I