Partner, M/S. Balaji Farm Fuel Centre, Nizamabad Dist And Anot v. Chief Manager, Hindustan Petrolium Corp.Ltd., Secunderabad

[ 32e6 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 34739 OF 2015 Between:

1. M/s. Balaji Farm Fuel Centre, HPCL Dealers (Petrol Pump), Sirsilla Road, Kamareddy, Nizamabad Districl 503 111, Rep. by its Partner Sri. Cheela Baskar S/o. Late Ch. Rajaiah, Aged 65 years, R/o.1-5-444, Ramareddy road, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District.

2. Smt. Cheela Vijaya, Wo. Late Cheela Kishan, R/o.1-5-458, Sirsilla Road, Kamareddy' Nizamabad District "..pETrroNERS AND Hindustan Petrolium Corp.LTD.,9-1-12011 , Sebastian Street, S.D. Road, P.B. No.5,Secunderabad - 500 003. Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Manager - Retail, sri s' Hari Prasad ...RES'.NDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders or writ particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent of terminating the dealership vide letter dated 05.02.2015, without any prior notice as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Clause I and Clause SB(a) of the agreement and is also violative of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent to re-instated the dealership agreement so as to allow the 1"t Petitioner to continue running the petrol o pump

/ IA. NO: 1 OF 201S{WPMP- NQ: 44643 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to allow the 1st Petitioner to continue running the petrol pump in the premises i.e., tt//s. Balaji Farm Fuel Centre, HPCL Dealers (Petrol Pump), Sircilla Road, Kamareddy, Nizamabad District- 503 1 1 1 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. KRUTIK REP Ms. SWAROOP OORILLA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI B. MAYUR REDDY, SC FOR HPCL The Court made the following: ORDER

...: -tr / THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34739 of 2O15 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Krutik, learned counsel representing Ms.Swaroop Ooorilla, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and hence, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.

In view of the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending sha_ll stand closed.

SD/- P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT FEGISTRAR ) SECfION OFFICER /ITRUE COPY// To, one CC to Ms. SWARooP ooRlLLA' Advgca!-e^tpllJ-Qi -, . il;66 iI sir. s MAYun nEoor sc FoR HPoL [oPUC] Two CD CoPies BM GJP o J

\ { HIGH COURT l i I DATED:2910812024 r r{E Sf4 fc .)* f \ oo '0 JA\ 2025 I r)

ORDER

WP.No.34739 ot 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS