Ravula Laxman, v. State Bank Of Hyderabad

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1379 of 2016 ORDER :

Heard both sides at length and perused the material on record. 2.

There is nothing to interfere with the impugned order of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Mancherial, in E.A.No.212 of 2015 in E.P.No.89 of 2011 dated 04.01.2016, but for to say from the saying of the revision petitioners/judgment debtors of there are talks and likelihood of settlement, though the learned counsel for auction purchaser saying there is no such information. 3.

In view of the above representation, the revision is disposed of granting one month time from today by keeping existing status quo, for any talks to fructify, meanwhile else law will take recourse. 4.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.

____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 27th September 2016.

Note:

Issue C.C. by tomorrow.

(b/o) mar