Employees State Insurance Corporation v. M/S Netenrich Technologies Pvt. Ltd
!N THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECETMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PEAL NO: 594 OF 2022 Appeal Under Section 82 of the ESI Act against the orders order dated 22-10-2022 in EtC No.16/2019 onthe file of the Employees lnsuranceCourt and Chairman, lndustrial Tribunal-t at Hyderabad . Between:
1. Employees State lnsurance Corporation, 5-9-23, Hill Fort Road, Hyderabad500 063 Rep. by its Additional Commissioner
2. Employees State lnsurance Corporation, 5-9-23, Hill Fort Road Hyderabad500 063 Rep. by its Deputy Director
3. The Recovery Officer, Employees State lnsurance Co.rporation 5-9-23, Hill Fort Road Hyderabad-500063 ...APPELLANTS AND.
M/s Netenrich Technologies Pvt. Ltd, Plot No. 770-F, Anantham Towers Road No.44, Jubilee Hills Hyderabad-500033 Rep. by its Finance Manager. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellants :
SRI. PASHAM SRINIVASULU Counsel forthe Respondent :
NONE The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
FIIGH COURT FOR THtr STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD.
**** THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON'BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR C.M.A.No.594 OF 2o.22 \ \ DATE: L6.L2.2O25 Betvt t:en :
The limployees State fnsurance Corporation and two others ...Appellants
Versus
M/s. Netenrich Technologies Pvt. Ltd.,
...Respondent
Mr .Pasham Srinivasulu, the learned Standing Counsel for ESIC appearing for the appellants.
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Justice Moustutmi Bhattacharya) 1.
The learned Standing Counsel for Employees' State Insurance Corporation appearing for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Appeal based on the New r\mnesty Schemc, 2025, and the sanction given by the Regiorral Director for the same. A Memo dated 25.11.2025 to that elfect has been filed b-v the Standing Counsel. 2.
Permissio., ,. u."o.*d.
//
I i :
I I It I I !i!
:i ,:
i 3.
C.M.A.No.594 of 2022, along with all connected applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. T.KRISHNA KUMAR JOrNT BFGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY/ sEckoFFrcER To,
1. The Employees lnsurance Court and Chairman lndustrialTribunlal-l at Hyderabad.
:
2. One CC to SRl. PASHAM SRINIVASULU Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies TUPSLw \ \
a HIGH COURT t, DATED:16i1212025 5 i,'ii ir </ C, C) 0 g ttB 2[26
ORDER
* t CMA.No.S9IA ot 2022 i ...i DISMISSING THE C.M.A. AS WITHDRAWN ,6,4 fa \Pr t a-;\il'-"