D. Prabhakar Rao v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh
[ 33oo ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 18086 OF 2011 I Between:
D. Prabhakar Rao, S/o: Late D. Surya Rao, Aged about 66 year, Occ: Member, CESS R/o Shanlhi Nagar, Mehar Nagar Road, Siricilla Mandal, Karimnagar District.
...PETITIONER AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Cooperation and Agriculture, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar, of Cooperative Societies, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad The District Collector, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District. J The Cooperative Electric Supply Society Ltd. (CESS),, rep. by its Managing Director, Sircilla, Karimnagar District.
Chennaiah, S/o. and age not known to the petitioner District Co-operative Officer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Artrcle 226 of lhe Constitutaon of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a proper writ order or orders, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondents in not conducting enquiry to safeguard the society pursuant to the representation dated 7.5.2O11 is arbitrary and illegal and consequently issue a direction to the respondents to suspend lhe present Managing Body by appointing District Collector as person incharge to conduct enquiry through Vigilance Officer.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO:21764 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a direction to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner dated 7.5.2011 pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD ASIFUDDIN Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and 2: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: SRI ARJUN, REPRESENTING FOR SRI CH KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.5:-- The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITroN NO.18086 0F 2011 ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the petitioner, when the case is called.
2.
It is represented by Mr'Arjun, Iearned coun$el appearing for respondent No.4 that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous' Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs' Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in tJ.is writ petition shall stand closed SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To, One CC to Sri Mohd Asifuddin, Advocate [OPUC] i*o CC. to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hvderabad IOUTI Oire CC to Sri Cn Koteswara Rao Advocate IOPUC] i*o CCrio GP for Cooperation, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies TJ GJP
HIGH COURT DATED:07102t2024 ( ltlE S14 r4 o( za 2 2 ilAB 2oz4
ORDER
* * UL.S,c,.TTCHg\) WP.No.18086 of 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
l) Aa,a0\ o Qr"1i'r