Kavva Vijaya Kumar v. The State Of Telangana

t [ 32s5 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciai Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY. THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) NO:4517 OF 2017 Between:

Kawa Vrlaya Kumar, S/o Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 37 years, Occ: S.G.Teacher, Mandal parlshad Primary School,Pakaguda(Metichandapuram), Marrigudem Mandal. Nalgonda District.

APPLICANT AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The Director ofSchool Education, State ofTelangana, Hyderabad-sOO 00 I The District Educational Officer, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda-508001 ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in not allowing the applicant to participate in the ensuing transfer counseling on the ground that he has participated in the transfer counseling conducted in the year 2013 and not relieved from the present station on the ground that no substitute was posted in his place and now asking to join in the new station as per the proceedings of the 3rd respondent dated 15.05.

20'13 is illegal, improper unjust arbitrary and contrary to law and further direct the respondents to allow the applicant to participate in the I I ensuing transfer counseling by granting entitlement points as per their length of service in the present place working along with other entitlement points. Counsel for the Applicant : SRl.

HONOURABI,E SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION (TR) No.4517 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/-8. CHANDRA PRAKASH ASSISTANI.REGISTRAR ($ SECTION OFFICER To, / //TRUE COPY//

1. One CC to SRl. M VENKAT RAM REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies KAR BS YT

I I HIGH COURT DATED:1 511212022 ) '.\ \ t ?

s + ii 't t F\ (\ I

ORDER

*r ,,, 11 WP(TR).No.4517 ot 2017 i I i I I I I DrsMrssrNc THE WRIT PETTTTON(TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS l I e q(4 \cr fld-a I i I i