Musukula Srinivas Reddy v. The Divisional Forest Officer (Wlm),

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD WRIT PETITION NO: 19553 OF 2011 Between:

1. Ivlusukula Srinivas Reddy, S/o I\,4andal, Warangal District.

2. Ambati Vikram Reddy, S/o.

I\,4andal, Warangal District.

. Adi Reddy R/o. Narakkapet Village, Nallabelly Ram Reddy R/o. Konapur Village, Kothagude ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The Divisional Forest Officer (WLIV), Warangal, Warangal District.

2. The Forest Range Officer, Kothaguda l, (WLl\,4) Warangal District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not releasing the Tractor (John Deere) bearing No.AP 36 L 5560 pending decision on the compounding of the offences U/s 59 of the A.P. Forest Act, 1967 or U/s 44 of the A.P. Forest Act as totally, arbitrary, illegal, violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to take a decision U/s 59 of the A.P. Forests Act pursuant to the Form-D compounding statement under Rule 5 of the Forest Offences (Compounding and Prosecution) Rules 1969.

WPMP. NO: 2363 5 0F 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release. the seized Tractor (John Deere) bearing No.AP 36 L 5560 in POR No.34/02 dated 7.1.20'1 1 on the file of the respondents. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. S. LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FORESTS The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD WRIT PETITION No.19553 of 2011 @E,B:

When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioners that in view of the interim orders dated 25.07 .2011, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the interim orders dated 25.07.2011. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. I I SD/.T.KRISHNA KUMAR ASSISTANTEEGISTRAR //TRUE coPY/, naSECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to Sri S. Lakshma Reddy, Advocate IOPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP for Forests, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies

4. One Spare Copy CHR anv *-

HIGH COURT DATED:2910612021 TAr ( .fco 12 JuL2021 :l * DEs PA.-!

ORDER

W.P.No.19553 of 2011 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS, Y\r n\t9