High Court for State of TelanganaWP/11999/2015disposed of no costs

Mahanth Kaniya Dass v. The State Of Telangana,

2015-06-09P Naveen Rao3 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.11999 of 2015 Dated : 09.06.2015 Between:

Mahanth Kaniya Dass Chela of Sri Late Mahanth Jagdish Dassji, Aged about 45 yrs, Occu : Mahanth of Sri Narayan Math Prachin, Hanuman Temple, R/o.D.No.21-3-850/A, Narayan Muth Prachin, Hanuman Temple, Hyderabad .. Petitioner And The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Endowment Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad-4 & another .. Respondents

This Court made the following :

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.11999 of 2015 ORDER :

Alleging that the representation submitted on 14.02.2012 to the Dharmika Parishad-2nd respondent herein, has not acted upon, and as no orders are passed, this Writ Petition is instituted.

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned Government Pleader representing the Endowment Department, Telangana State, submits that Dharmika Parishad is not in existence and therefore, the question of passing of orders by the said Dharmika Parishad does not arise and as such the Writ Petition is

not maintainable.

3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fact that Dharmika Parishad does not exist, the petitioner may be given liberty to submit representation to the 1st respondent, ventilating the grievance as agitated in the representation dated 14.02.2012.

4. Having regard to the above, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to the 1st respondent i.e., State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Endowment Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, ventilating the grievance as agitated in the representation dated 14.02.2012. As and when such representation is received, the 1st respondent shall consider and pass appropriate orders as warranted by law. If there are rival claims, and if the Government intend to act on the representation submitted by the petitioner, it is necessary to put on notice all those persons who are likely to be affected, and take appropriate action as warranted by law. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 9th June, 2015 Rds