Jamuna Devi, v. The State Of Telangana
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23716 of 2015 09.11.2015 Between:
Jamuna Devi .. Petitioner and The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.B.Vijaysen Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development (AP) Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3:Mr.N.Praveen Kumar, standing counsel for Municipalities The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The limited grievance with which the petitioner filed this writ petition is that in the stay application filed in the appeal filed by her against the order of respondent No.3 styled as notice cancelling her building permission, respondent No.2 has not been passing any order.
At the hearing, Mr.N.Praveen Kumar, learned standing counsel for Municipalities appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, on instructions, submitted that due to the health problems of the Chairman of respondent No.2, council has not met for the last two months and that it will meet immediately after Diwali and consider the petitioner's application for the interim relief. In the light of the above submissions of the learned standing counsel, which are placed on record, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2 to consider the petitioner's application for stay and communicate its decision to her within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Pending such consideration, respondent Nos.2 and 3 shall not take any action with respect to the building already constructed by the petitioner. The petitioner, however, is not permitted to raise further construction pending the appeal.
As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.30744 of 2015 filed by the petitioner for interim relief shall stand disposed of as infructuous. _________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 09th November, 2015 GHN