Kudukuntla Nandini v. The State Of Telangana 3 Others

[ 32s6 | HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 4642s OF 2022 Betwe€n:

Kudukuntla Nandini, Wo. K. Darmendar, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H. No. 2-130/8, RSBR No. 30211, Nagarala Village, Sreerangapur Mandal, Wanaparthy District. ...PETITIONER AND I . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Departrnent, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector (LA). Wanaparthy District, Wanaparthy.

3. The Special Deputy Collector, LARLISPJI, Pebbair Wanaparthy District.

4. The Executive Engineer, Division-I, Pebbair, Wanaparthy District. til..sPoNI)EN't S Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ol India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not making the payment of the compensalion to the petitioner even to the approved extent of 4804 Sq. Meters of the open area of house property bearing No. 2-13018 at Nagarala village, Sreerangapuram Mandal, Wanaparthy District, by passing the final award in terms of the draft award submitted by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent in file No.

Bll43l20l8, d,ated, 26-07 -2022 though the above property of the petitioner was submerged in the project in the year 2009, as illegal, unlawful, contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to pass the final award and pay the proposed compensation as mentioned in the draft award at least in respect of the above property by leaving it open to the petitioner to work out her claim for the remaining 55 Sq.

Meters and shed, IA NO: I OF 2022 Petition under Section i5l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit frled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To issue interim order directing the respondents to pass the final award in terms of the proposals submitted by the 3rd respondent to the 2rd respondent dated 26-07 -2022 and pay the proposed compensation as proposed in the draft award atleast to the extent of 4804 Sq. Meters of open place of house property bearing no.

Sreerangapur Mandal, Wanaparthy District, forthwith as the above property was submerged in the project in the year 2009 itself, by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 29 -09 -2022, Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. M DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.46425 OF 2022 ORDER:

Mr. M. Damodar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscelianeous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed. \ SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIw O\\_()FFI CER To, one cc to sRI. M DAMODAR REDDY Advocate [oPUCl One CC to ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL' High Court at Hvderabad [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies

HIGH COURT MSK,J DATED:1310212023 =+-'-'

:) I I 2 4 ttB ?c23 :

'Jn.

.:.,,'

l.'

ORDER

WP.No.46425 of 2022 WP IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS