Sharad Singh Thakur v. The State Of Telangana
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3251 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 11 8740F 2022 Between:
Sharad Singh Thakur, S/o. Manmohan Singh Thakur, Age.42 yrs, Occ. Business, R/o.H.No.B-2-21'1, Kummariguda, Secunderabad - 500003 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.7 AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court for the state of Telangana The Station House Officer, PS Chilkalguda, Gopalapuram Division ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praylng that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in C.C.No,2739 ot 2021 on the file of the X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Secunderabad registered under Sec 34 (A) of T.S. Excise Act against the petitioner/accused nos.2 LA. NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.
C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner/accused no.7 in C.C.No.2739 of 2O21 on the file of the X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at City Civil Court, Secunderabad registered under sec.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER c MINA PETITIO N No.11874 0F 2022 ORD ER:
This Criminal petition is filed under Section 4g2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short .Cr.p.C.) by the petitioner_ Accused No.7 to quash the proceedings against him in C.C.No.2739 of 202L pending on the file of learned X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, City Civil Court at Secunderabad. The offences alleged against them are under Section 34-A TS Excise Act. )
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1 State.
Perused the record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to dispense with the attendance of the petitioner-Accused No.7. 4.
Thus, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the attendance of the petitioner herein - Accused No.7 is dispensed with in c.c.No.2739 of 2021 pending on the fire of learned X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, City Civil Court at Secunderabad, when represented by his counsel on record. The attendance of the petitioner-accused No.7 is dispensed with subject to filing an affidavit by the petitioner stating that in his absence the proceedings conducted by his counsel will not be disputed by him in
Crl.petition No.t18 ,O ", ,[1::
any manner and also he shall notLispute his identity. However, the petitioner shall appear before the learned Magistrate as and when his presence is required. In the event of the petitioner failure to appear when the Court directs, this order dispensing his attendance would stand cancelled.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous apprications pending, if any, shail stand crosed. //rRUE copy, ^Tl-,:.f^.#T."J,tItr[ lv , . \,\, ', To,
1. The X Additionar chief A/e+r^^^r;+^^ r,- . sEcrloN oFFlcER ^ secunderabad tf Metropolitan Magistrate, city civil court at z. .t.wo CCs to the public " !,yoe13oao. rOGi"""
Prosecutor' High court for the state of retangana at l, gi: i[i. #.N.";&:'fft,:B,::11*::.x 3"J;3f,,", Division i, ,*o CD Copies il
\ HIGH COURT DATED:30 t12t2022
ORDER
CRLP.No.11Bt4 ot 2022 1 He Sr4 l'F o..:
2 i J[li 2ffi3 c ,..+ fFgr DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION \o