E.R.K. Valliswar, v. The State Of Telanaana

[ 31831 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: '10339 OF 2015 Between:

as!ry, Aged 34 Yrs, Occ. Business C/o. 5O1, 5"' Floor, Saleemnagar Colony, Malakpet, E.R.K. Valliswar, S/o. E N S Swathi Apartments Block B, Hyderahad ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telanaana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Bldgs, Saifabad, Hyderabad The Station House Officer, P S Osmaniya University, Hyderabad M Simhachalam Naidu, S/o: Late M Pentan Naidu, Aged about 46 Yrs, Occ. Business Ri/o. Hat No. 304, Prime Castle Apartments, FZavindra Nagar Colony, Habsuguda, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ.

of mandamus declaring the inaction of the 2M respondent in arresting and investigating into the offences under Sec. 4A6,4m r/w. 156(3) Cr PC registered under FIR No.24812014 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondent No. 2 to arrest the 3rd respondent and take further action in pursuance of FIR No. 24N2O14.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 13641 OF 2015) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct

the 2nd respondent to arrest the 3rd respondent and investigate into the offence in FIR in Crime No. 248114 pending disposal of WP Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENUGOPALA RAO PASNOORU Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.3:- The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRIIUSTTCE B. VITAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.10339 OF 2015 ORDER: (ORAL) ' When the matter was listed on 05.1,2.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed on 1L.72.2024 under the caption 'For dismissal,. Even today, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the matter being listed under the caption ,For dismissal,. 2.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.

so/- K.S ASSI REERA MA MURTHY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII To, s FFICER I d$:fg5if{r*ni:

[oPUcl Telangana, at i,13s 3: :r",:','d,. isu,:':?

a TJ .

BSR

I HIGH COURT DATED:1 211212024 gE Sr4p ( 3 30 JAN 2025 o

ORDER

o €;.

'r 1., f.)t :i WP.No.10339 of 2015 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS @ W