The Society Of Trustees Of Indigenous Churches In India v. The State Of Telangana

- [3311 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI WRIT APPEAL NO: 3 OF 2023 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred against the order dated 2311212022 passed in W.P.No.6725 o'f 2022 on the file of the High Court. Between:

The Society of Trustees of Indigenous Churches ln India, Regd. No. 11411971, Represented by its Authorized person, R. Veera Chary, S/o Narasaiah, Age 52 years, Hebron Church, PJo. 1-1-574, Golconda CroSs Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, TS-500 020.

...APPELLANT/ WRIT PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Central Zone, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chikadpally, Chikadpally Police Station, Chikadpally.

4. The Station House Officer, Chikadpally Police Station, Chikadpally.

5. The Sub- lnspector of Police, Chikadpally Police Station, Chikadpally.

6. Y. Jon Subba Reddy, S/o. Ram Subba Reddy, Aged about 70 years, Chairman, Indigenours Churches in India Trust, Rl/o. Eshcol Prayer House, 1st Lane, Cloghpet, Ongole, A.P.

7. F.C.S.Petel S/ o. M.N. Peter, Aged aboutT4 years, Chairman, lndigenours Churches in lndia Trust, F|/o. Flat No. 201, 1st Floor, SK Fort House, Golconda Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad-20. ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant : SRl. K. SAI SRI HARSHA REP FOR K V BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHI,IYAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI WRIT APPEAL No.3 of 2023 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhrgan) Heard Mr. K.Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel representing Mr. K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned counsel for the appeilant.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the writ appeai.

3. Writ Appeal 1S accordingly dismissed on withdrawal. Flowever, there shail be no order as to costs. 4.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Appeal, shall stand closed. SD/- CH. VENKATESHWARULU DEPUP-REGISTRAR Qt) SECTION OFFICER '1. One CC to SRl. K V BHANU PRASAD, Advocate IOPUC]

2. One CC to SRl. CHANDRAIAH SUNKARA, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. ASAD HUSSAIN, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Copies KAR GJP ,TRUE COPY// To, BSR

HIGH COURT DATED:0510112023 V\E $T4Ie ( q i.11 lill,J 1E t[3 J J ' 1".

JUDGMENT

WA.No.3 of 2023 DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \.,e q o? g"K