K Yadagiri, Ranga Reddy Dist v. K Mukundam, Secunderabad
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECET\I4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A,VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4363 OF 20'15 Petition under Section 151 Civil Procedure Code aga insUaggrieved by the Order dated. 21.09.2015 passed in EP NO.3'15 of 2008 on the file of the Principal senior civil Judg, Rangareddy District against OS.No.3997 of 2004 on the file of the V Senior Civil Judge, Hyderabad Between:
K Yad 336/1, agiri, Ranga Reddy S/o. Late Sailu, aged about 53 years, Occ: Nil, R/o. 48Ganeshnagar. Chintal, HMT Road, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONERYJUDGMENT DEBTORYDEFENDANT AND K Mukundam, S/o. Late Ramachandraiah, aged about 49 years, Occ: Private Employee, Rl/o. H.No.8-7-20O/12, P.V. Enclave, Samathanagar, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad.
...RESPONDENT/DECREE HOLDER/PLAINTIFF CRPMP. NO:5783 OF 2015:
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings passed in E.P.No.315 of 2008 in O-S.No.3997 of 2004 on the file of the V Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad Dt.21-9-2O15 pending disposal of the C.R.P Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: ASHOK REDDY KANATHALA The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A'VENKATESHWAT:'|r' RIEDDY qIvLL-BEflg@9E-2!)1s oRDER None ap1'ears on behaif of the revision F'etitioner' Perused the rec' rrcl and the case status information' .t'his Civil Revision Petitior r is filed assailing the orders dated l)l '09'20i5 in E.P.No.315 o 2OO8, as per the case status infornration' this said Execution )etition was disposed of as dismissec' i'rs clefault ott 27 .11 .2O 18 itself' Since no cause survives' this Civil Revision Petiti )n is dismissed as infructuous' In the circumstances lf the case, there shall be no orde : as to the costs. Miscellat Leous applications, if any pending' shal1 stands closed.
Sd/- N CHANT}]IIA SEKHAR RAO ASStTiT ANt- REGt\TRAR sr:cror.iilJ,;=- I To, //TRUE COPY//
1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranqa Reddv District.
2. One CC to S ?t. B PARAME_S-EWAru{ BnO, Advocate [O:,l.lC]
3. One CC to St ll. AIiHOK REDDY KANATHALA, Advocaie [CrpUC]
4. Two CD Col ries NI
\ HIGH COUITT DATED:3011212022 "tsi: STATe k ll:, o(, ?
? [ ttB ?t?3
ORDER
CRP.No.43t 3 of 2015 .-t _. ^,,t-', CRP DISMISSED A; INFRUCTUOUS L (n rr.\'\6