Areef Ahmed Khan v. Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, I.A.S
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
,ii'
[ 3300 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD I\4ONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3494 OF 2025 Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act R/w Article 215 of the Constitution of lndia to punish the respondents herein wilfully and wontedly deliberately/violating/disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 10-072025 passed in W.P.No.19593 of 2025. Between:
Areef Ahmed Khan, S/o Esak Ahmed Khan, aged about 62 years, Retd. Superintendent O/o The Executive Engineer, lrrigation Division No.4, Mahabubnagar, R/o H.No.10-91/5/8, Near Rabia Majid, Marlu, Palakonda Road, tvlahaboobnaga r (PPO. No. 1 1 -0202621 SP) ... Petiti one r/Petitioner AND
1. Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, l.A.S, Now Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning Dept, Government of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. Sri K.S.R.C.Murthy, Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Govt. of T.S. lnsurance Buildings, Abids, Hyderabad.
...Respondents/Respondent No.1 and 2
in main W.P.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. P. Venkat Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following: ORDER
(-'
IN 'fHE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A CONTEMFT CASE No.3494 OF 2025 29.L2.2()25 Betweern:
Areef A,emed Khan
...Petitioner
t AND t ( Sri Sandeep Kumar Sultania, I.A.S, and another
...Respondents
ORDER:'- This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful disobedience of the order dat.ed 1O.O7.2025 passed in W.P.No.19593 of 2025. 2.
When the matter was taken up for consideration, learned Governm=nt Fleader for Finance Department, appearing for the respondents, placed on record a letter dated 27.12.2025 addressecl from respondent No.1, wherein it was stated that, rn complianc:e with the orders of this Court, the payment of pensionary benefits in C.C.No.3494 of 2025 in W.P. No.19593 of 2025 has been successfully processed and disbursed, and
the payment details were enclosed. Therefore, it is stated that the respondents had compried with the order dated lo.or.2o2s passed by this court in W.p.No.19593 of 2025. Recording the said submissions, the contempt case is closed. No costs Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shail stand closed.
sd/- N.
DRA SEKHAR RAO REGI //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Mr. P. Venkat Reddy, Advocate [O
2. Two CD CoPies kam9
tt HIGH COURT I DATED ii2911212025 S THE ( fJ f ?ffi iB ( * *
ORDER
CC.No.3494 ol 2025 CLOSING THE CC Ir