← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/15586/2025allowed no costs

Cheni Pavan v. The State Of Telangana,

2025-12-03K. Sujana5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15586 OF 2025 03rd DAY OF DECEMBER 2025 Between :

Cheni Pavan ...

Petitioner/A.1 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad & another ... Respondents ORDER :

This criminal petition is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/A.1 seeking his enlargement on bail in connection with Crime No.499 of 2025 of Vemulawada Town Police Station, Rajanna Sircilla District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Section 109(1) r/w.3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (2023).

- 2 - 2.

The case of the prosecution is that the de facto complainant lodged a police complaint on 08.10.2025, stating that the petitioner herein and two others attacked his brother with a knife with an intention to kill him. A.1 attacked with knife and the other two persons attacked with hands, due to which the injured received bleeding injuries on his stomach, right hand and other parts of the body. Hence, requested the police to take necessary action against the accused. Basing on the said complaint, police registered the case against the accused for the above offence.

3.

Heard Sri Mohd. Fasiuddin, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 4.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and he is falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in jail from 13.10.2025 and material part of investigation is already completed. According to the trial Court charge sheet is also filed, therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. As such, prayed this Court to grant bail to the petitioner.

- 3 - 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail on the ground that the offences alleged against the petitioner are serious in nature and he is also involved in another case in Cr.No.464 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Section 353 and 504 r/w.34 of IPC. The injured witness sustained grievous injuries which are stab injuries. As such, prayed this Court to dismiss this petition.

6.

Considering the submissions made and a perusal of material on record, petitioner is in jail from 13.10.2025. The record shows that material part of investigation is completed. The injured suffered two injuries, one grievous and one simple. Considering the period of incarceration of petitioner in jail and the progress in investigation, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioner/A.1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of Principal Sessions Judge, Rajanna Sircilla.

ii.

The petitioner/A.1 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Wednesday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.

- 4 - iii.

The petitioner/A.1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 483(2) of BNSS.

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date :03.12.2025 Rds

- 5 - THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15586 OF 2025 DATE :03.12.2025 Rds