Vijay Agarwal v. Mohammed Irfan Khan

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD MAIN CASE NO: W.A.Nos.881 of 2022, 23 of 2023, 27 of 2023 and PROCEEDING SHEET SL.

NO DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 02.

09.03.2023 HCJ & NTRJ I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.A.No.881 of 2022;

Transfer red to i/o folder, before correctio ns, if any.

I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.A.No.23 of 2023;

I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.A.No.27 of 2023;

and I.A.No.1 of 2023 in W.A.No.32 of 2023 Heard Mr. A.M.Qureshi, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Mohd.

Naseeruddin, learned counsel for the appellant.

These interlocutory applications have been filed by the appellant seeking leave to file the related appeals.

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the prayer made is allowed.

Interlocutory applications are accordingly disposed of.

I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.A.No.881 of 2022;

I.A.No.2 of 2023 in W.A.No.23 of 2023;

I.A.No.2 of 2023 in W.A.No.27 of 2023;

and I.A.No.2 of 2023 in W.A.No.32 of 2023 Heard Mr. A.M.Qureshi, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Mohd.

Naseeruddin, learned counsel for the

SL.

NO DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE appellant.

These interlocutory applications have been filed by the appellant for condoning the delay in filing the related appeals.

The reasons for the delay have been mentioned in the supporting affidavits.

After hearing learned counsel for the appellant and on due consideration, the delay in filing the related appeals is condoned.

Interlocutory applications are accordingly disposed of.

_____________ HCJ _____________ NTRJ W.A.Nos.881 of 2022, 23 of 2023, 27 of 2023 and 32 of 2023 Writ Appeals are allowed.

(Vide Separate Common Judgment) (B/o.) KL