Chintha Sreepati v. M.Thirupathaiah

[ 32s6 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 31 OF 2023 Contempt case under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to Punish the Respondents herein for willfully not implementing the Orders of the High Court dated 27.06.2022 passed in W.P.No. 2561012022 and to direct R1 & R2 to implement the orders in W.P.No. 2561012022 with Police Security within the time frame.

Between:

Chintha Sreepati, S/o. Chintha Thirupati Aged about-46 years, OccAgriculturist, Fl/o. H.No. 1-1 , Panchadevu pad Village, Makthal Mandal, Narayanpet District Telangana State ...PETITIONER AND

1. M. Thirupathaiah, The Tahsildar/MRO Makthal Mandal, Narayanpet District Telangana State.

I t

2. Mr. Vijay Kumar, Village Revenue Officer/R.l Panchadevu pad Village, Telangana State.

3. Sri. Somesh Kumar lAS, The State of Telangana Represented By prinicipal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N NARASIMHA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE No.31 of 2o23 ORDER:

This contempt case is filed complaining violation of the order dated 27.06.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.25610 of 2022 pursuant to the online application submitted by the petitioner. 2.

The respondents liled counter affidavit stating that the survey, as directed by this Court, was conducted and a detailed order was passed by the respondents vide Endorsement No.C/ 1 17 22 I 2022, dated 06.01.2023.

3.

However, there appears to be some delay in conducting survey. This Court is not inclined to go into the aspect of delay, as there is no deliberate violation of the order passed by this Court. 4.

Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the manner in which tJre survey is conducted or the findings that are recorded in the Endorsement No.C/ 1172212022, dated 06.01.2023, it is open to the petitioner to take appropriate steps to question the said endorsement. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the contempt case shall stand closed.

.!'

( SECTION OFFICER I I Sd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR I ,TRUE COPY// To,

1. One CC to SRl. N NARASIMHA MURTHY, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUIJ

3. Two CD Copies 3rx VH

HIGH COURT MSK, J DATED: 1010212023 1EL.'1,, Ari'

s-"

-k o UJ 4) \=a 't s t\ (.)

ORDER

J CC.No.31 ot 2023 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE il,-3 $"Jx rB