Talari Balaiah v. The State Of Telangana,

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.37070 of 2016 ORDER:

1.

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to direct the 4th respondent to initiate afresh the consultative process with the Principal District & Sessions Court-cumMetropolitan Sessions Court, Ranga Reddy District, L.B. Nagar and to direct the 3rd respondent to act strictly in accordance with law in sending the panel to the 4th respondent.

2.

Heard and perused the material available on record. 3.

The main grievance of the petitioner is that his name was not mentioned in the panel sent to the 4th respondent so as to recommend for appointment of Additional Public prosecutors. 4.

The material on record goes to show that he is also one of the persons applied for Additional Public Prosecutors. But the petitioner has not filed any material to show as to whether he is also one of the persons eligible to be recommended in the panel for appointment of the Additional Public Prosecutors. Further, mere submission of the application itself does not confer any right claiming to be added in the panel. However, the cause of action would be arisen only when the candidates in the panel are found to be considered without any norms. Therefore, the very approach of the petitioner is not maintainable.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the proceedings that would be issued

appointing the Public Prosecutors, if he is so advised. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________ RAJA ELANGO, J Date: 1st November, 2016 Nn

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO WRIT PETITION No.37070 of 2016 Date: 1st November, 2016 Nn