← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC/2025/2012closed no costs

Shaik Rahamtulla v. Mr.N.Narsing Rao

2023-12-07J Sreenivas Rao4 pages

I I ) I [ 3303 ] I i HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE I :

PRESENT i i i THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2o2s OF 2012 (Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for non considering the application dated 01 .1O.2012 filed for conversion of agricultural lands in survey No.5/19A extent 3.08 gts situated at Peddanapally village, Kasipet mandal to establish the retail outlet of HPCL petrol extent 0.25 gts., Ac.2.00 for establishing the garden function hall and remaining area of 0.23 gts for the construction of Dhaba Hotel as per the orders of Hon'ble Court dated 21 .09.2012 in WP No. 294O5 ot 2012. Between:

Shaik Rahamtulla, S/o Abdul Gafoor, Aged about 70 years. Ri/o H.No. 74-952 Bellampally village and Mandal Adilabad District ...PETITIONER AND Mr.N.Narsing Rao, S/o Not known The Revenue Divisional Officer Mancherial, Adilabad Dist.

...CONTEMNOR l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(APPL. NO:12O7 OF 20121 Petition under Section 't 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pending disposal of the contempt case may direct the respondent to consider the

application dated 01.'10.2012 filed under section 3 0f conversion of Agricultural lands to Non Agricultural purpose Act 2006.

For the Petitioner: SRI cUOt MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, ADVOCATE For the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER j it

/ HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENryAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 2025 of 2Ol2 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the respondents implemented the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.294O5 of 2012, dated 2t.O9.2Ot2.

2.

In wiew of the above submission, no further adjudication is required in this case.

3.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/-I. NAGALAKSHMI //TRUE COPY// DEPUTY R G]STRAR sEcTlo FFICER To, One CC to SRI GUD| MADIUSUDHAN REDDY, Advocate tOpUC] Two CCs .!o- G.! for n"r#r", High Court for the State of Tetangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies MP GJP

L HIGH COURT DATED:0711212023 T s r tl I 1 0 ,lAN 2[2t vzo Jor) { AT t oE P s *

ORDER

CC.No.2025 ot 2012 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE 6tec oa, q\ @G\r'