High Court for State of TelanganaWP/26053/2014dismissed no costs

Sri Balla Satayanarayana, v. The Tg., Rep. By Commissioner Of Police, R.R.Dist, And 5 Other

2019-12-13P.Keshava Rao2 pages

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.26053 of 2014 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under: "... to issue an order, direction or a W.P. more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondent in registering the complaint dtd. 14.08.2014 lodged by the petitioner to apprehend the accused and to produce the accused for remand and to file charge sheet as arbitrary, illegal, malafide, unjust being violation of provisions of Cr.P.C. and Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the 3rd and 5th respondents to register the complaint dtd. 14.08.2014 submitted by petitioner and to apprehend the accused and others and to remand them to the Hon'ble Court concerned."

Learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5 placed on record written instructions dated 09.09.2014 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Neredmet Police Station, Cyberabad.

From a perusal of the said written instructions, it is revealed that on 14.08.2014 at 11.00 p.m., in the night the petitioner approached the 5th respondent and orally stated that the 6th respondent and another came to his house and beat him and threatened him with dire consequences. The petitioner also requested the police to send him to hospital for treatment. As the Sub-Inspector of Police was on patrolling duty, the police head constable, who was present in the police station, gave a requisition to the hospital. However, the petitioner did not return to the police station. On 15.08.2014, the Neredmet police called the petitioner over cell

phone, but he did not approach the respondent police even on the date of issuance of the written instructions. It is further mentioned in the written instructions that whenever the petitioner approaches the police station, necessary action will be taken on his complaint in accordance with law. In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that there are no merits in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.

_____________________ P. KESHAVA RAO, J Date: 13.12.2019.