Ch. Bhadra Reddy v. Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority,
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Writ Petition Nos.3606, 3607 and 3609 of 2012 Date: 19-06-2015 W.P.No.3606 of 2012 Between:
Ch. Bhadra Reddy .. Petitioner AND The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, represented by its Vice Chairman, Hyderabad .. Respondent W.P.No.3607 of 2012 Between:
Ch. Bhadra Reddy .. Petitioner AND The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, represented by its Vice Chairman, Hyderabad .. Respondent W.P.No.3609 of 2012
Between:
M. Mamatha Reddy .. Petitioner AND The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, represented by its Vice Chairman, Hyderabad .. Respondent HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Writ Petition Nos.3606, 3607 and 3609 of 2012 ORDER:
In all these writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the proceedings in Lr.No.27947/LRS/Plg/HMDA/2008, DATED 13-12-2011 issued by the respondent whereby and whereunder the LRS application filed by the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1.04 guntas in Survey No.59 of Bahadurpally village, Quthubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District was rejected by the respondent-authority.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Y. Rama Rao, learned standing counsel for the respondent authority states that the petitioners in all these writ petitions have alternative remedy of appeal against the order of rejection, which is impugned herein, under Rule 15 of the A.P. Regulation of Unapproved and Illegal Layout Rules, 2007 framed in G.O.Ms.No.902, Municipal Administration & Urban Development (M1) Department, dated 31-12-2007. Though the learned counsel for the petitioners in these writ petitions raised several contentions, but, in view of alternative remedy of appeal available under Rule 15 of the Rules, it is open for the petitioners in these writ petitions to
prefer an appeal against the impugned order of rejection to the Appellate Committee constituted by the Government, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of the order and on preferring such appeal by the petitioners, the competent Appellate Committee shall consider the same on merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
With the above direction, these writ petitions are disposed of. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _____________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J Date: 19-06-2015 Ksn