Kanche Ramulu v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY I.A.Nos.02 and 03 OF 2018 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10334 OF 2018 ORDER:

I.A.Nos.02 and 03 of 2018 These miscellaneous petitions are filed under Section 320 (2) and (6) read with Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short "Cr.P.C.") seeking leave to compromise the case and compound the offence punishable under Section 387 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short "I.P.C."), as the matter is settled outside the Court and they entered into compromise and filed joint memo to that effect.

Complainant and the petitioners/accused are present and they are identified by their counsel and Public Prosecutor, produced Photostat copies of aadhar cards in proof of their identity. When the terms and conditions of compromise are explained in vernacular language, they are admitted to be true and correct.

On enquiry the parties stated that they settled the issue outside the Court due to intervention of elders and well-wishers and they intend to lead peaceful life.

As the offence committed by the petitioners is not against the society and the compromise is voluntary, I find that it is a fit case to grant permission to compound the offence. Hence, compromise

MSM,J Crl.P_10334_2018 is recorded in terms of the joint memo filed along with the compromise petition. Accordingly, the petitions are ordered. Crl.P.No.10334 of 2018 In view of the orders passed in I.A.Nos.02 and 03 of 2018, the present petition is allowed in terms of the joint compromise memo filed by both parties. No costs.

Registry is directed to annex a copy of the joint memo filed by both parties, to this order.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand dismissed.

_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY 27.09.2018 Ksp