Vasam Tulashamma (Surrendered Naxalite) v. The Superintendent Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY THE TWENTYTHIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEEN PRESENT Between:

Vasam Tulashamma [surrendered naxallite]... Petitioner Vs.

The Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda Nalgonda district & Ors. ... Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Shaik Jilani Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Home The Court made the following: [order follows] O R D E R :

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief :

"To declare the inaction on the part of Respondents 1, 4 and 5 in not taking any action against Respondents 6 and 7 inspite of petitioner's written complaint dated 04/11/2011 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently to direct Respondents 1, 4 and 5 to forthwith act upon the complaint dated 04/11/2011 and to take immediate action against Respondents 6 and 7 in accordance with law and to grant such other suitable reliefs as this court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

2. Heard Sri Shaik Jilani, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for respondents.

3. As evident from the material on record, the complaint of the petitioner is nonregistration of crime by Respondents 6 and 7 on the complaint said to have been given by the petitioner herein on 04/11/2011.

4. A counter-affidavit is filed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, II-Town Police Station, Nalgonda. Para No.13 of the counter reads as under: It is submitted that the petitioner is a petition monger, often filing false petitions before the Government officials and wasting of valuable time and also trying to blackmail them. The petitioner unnecessarily involving into ignorant people issues and misguiding them. Due to the type of activities of the petitioner, several people facing troubles so far.

5 . While referring the above paragraph No.11 of the counter-affidavit, it is requested by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition can be disposed of by recording the said instructions with a liberty to avail the remedies open to the petitioner under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure.

6. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner herein to avail the remedies open for the petitioner under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure. No costs.

7. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

_____________________ JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI 23/11/2015 I s L

Date: 23/11/2015 Circulation No.

Court Master: I s L