Doma Madhu Yadav v. The State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15790 of 2025 DATE: 08.12.2025 Between:
Doma Madhu Yadav .... Petitioner/accused AND The State of Telangana, Through SHO, Shamshabad P.S., Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
.... Respondent/Complainant ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/accused seeking enlargement on bail in Crime No.555 of 2025 of Shamshabad Police Station,
Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offence punishable under Section 108 of the BNS.
2.
The brief facts of the case are that, on 13.09.2025, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that the deceased, who is the complainant's brother-in-law, committed suicide by consuming pesticide, as the petitioner purchased an Ertiga Car from the deceased and not paid the instalment as per the agreement between the petitioner and the deceased, as such, the deceased committed suicide and the name of the petitioner is mentioned in the suicide note of the deceased. Hence, he requested for necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offence.
3.
Heard Sri Mahesh Mamindla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he is falsely implicated in this case and there is no such instigation to attract the offence punishable under Section
108 of the BNS and it is due of three months EMI to the finance company, which is not a reason for the death of the deceased and he is in jail since 15.11.2025 and the material part of the investigation was already completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the petitioner herein is responsible for the death of the deceased and there is a clear suicide note that the petitioner is responsible for the death of the deceased and the investigation is not yet completed and prayed to dismiss this petition.
6.
Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel and the material on record, the petitioner herein is in jail from 15.11.2025 and as seen from the record, LWs 1 to 12 witnesses were already examined including the investigating authority and the material part of the investigation was already completed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration
of petitioner in jail, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner/accused subject to the following conditions: i.
The petitioner/accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned XI Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, at Rajendranagar.
ii.
The petitioner/accused shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Wednesday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner/accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 483(2) of BNSS. 7.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 08.12.2025 TU
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15790 2025 Date:08.12.2025 TU