Anwar Hussain, v. The State Of Telangana,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT
HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15778 of 2025 DATE: 09.12.2025 Between:
Anwar Hussain .... Petitioner/accused No.1 AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
.... Respondent/Complainant ORDER:
This criminal petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/accused No.1 seeking enlargement on bail in Crime No.975 of 2025 of Attapur Police Station,
Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 140(1), 109(1) r/w 3(5) of the BNS. 2.
The case of the prosecution is that, on 14.11.2025, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that, on 14.11.2025, his younger brother had received phone call from petitioner and on that, his brother along with his friend have gone to met petitioner near Pillar No.121, then the petitioner along with other persons have forcibly kidnapped his brother in a car and on hearing the same, one of his friend has informed the de-facto complainant that his brother has brutally beaten and his friend has chased the car and caught near Olive Hospital and also informed to Helpline-100. Hence, he requested for necessary action. Basing on the same, the police registered a case for the above said offences. 3.
Heard Sri C. Sharan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and he is in jail since 15.11.2025 and in fact, the petitioner is a disabled
person and he cannot brutally beat the injured person and the injured person sustained simple injuries and he already discharged from the hospital and the entire investigation is already completed and prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition. 5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature and there are severe injuries sustained by the injured witness. At this stage, he is not entitled for the bail and prayed to dismiss this petition.
6.
Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel and the material on record, petitioner is in jail since 15.11.2025 and as seen from the record, the injured witness sustained severe injuries and treated as outpatient. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the disability of the petitioner and also the period of incarceration of petitioner in jail, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner/accused No.1 subject to the following conditions: i.
The petitioner/accused No.1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned XXV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Cyberabad, at Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy District.
ii.
The petitioner/accused No.1 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Wednesday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioner/accused No.1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 483(2) of BNSS.
7.
Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 09.12.2025 TU
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.15778 2025 Date:09.12.2025 TU