← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/13863/2015dismissed

V.Chandramouli v. R. Naveen Kumar

2015-12-29T.Sunil Chowdary2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY CRIMINAL PETITION No.13863 of 2015 ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.192 of 2015 on the file of the Station House Officer, Chittoor II Town Police Station, Chittoor District, registered for the offences under Section 3 (1) (ii) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 384, 323, 341 and 506 I.P.C.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State.

3. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner is the sole accused and the first respondent is the de facto complainant in Crime No.192 of 2015.

4. As per the allegations made in the complaint, the petitioner has been carrying on money lending business in Chittoor Town. It is further alleged that the petitioner has forcibly taken the gold ornaments from the wife of the first respondent. It is also alleged that the petitioner has insulted the first respondent in the name of his caste in the presence of others.

5. Whether the petitioner has committed the alleged offences or not will come to light during the course of investigation. While exercising the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the Court has to take into consideration the allegations made in the complaint only. The Court is not justified in embarking upon an enquiry as to probability, reliability or genuineness of the allegations made in the complaint at the initial stage of investigation. The material placed before the Court i s prima facie sufficient to investigate into the matter in order to ascertain the truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations made in the complaint.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in R.P.Kapoor v. [1] [2], I am of the State of Punjab and State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal considered view that it is not a fit case to quash the proceedings at the initial stage of the investigation.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the concerned Station House Officer may be directed not to arrest the petitioner till completion of the investigation.

8. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to direct the Station House Officer, Chittoor II Town Police Station, Chittoor District, not to arrest the petitioner/accused in Crime No.192 of 2015 till completion of the investigation.

9. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

10. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J Date: 29.12.2015 Ivd [1] AIR 1960 SC 866 [2] AIR 1992 SC 604