B. Hanuman Naik v. The State Of Telangana, Rep.By Its Principal Secretary,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO W.P.No.38114 of 2014 O R D E R:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2.

The prayer in the Writ Petition is as under:

"to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not taking any action and arresting the respondents 4 and 5 in Crime No 732 of 2010 on the file of Madhapur P.S.

Hyderabad is illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to take action and arrest the respondents and investigate into the matter and pass such other order"

3.

The learned Government Pleader for Home brought to the notice of this Court that pursuant to the registration of Crime No.732 of 2010 on the file of the Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, investigation was completed and a final report was filed referring the case as 'lack of evidence' on 31.07.2015 before the Court of XXV Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad.

4.

In that view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive in the Writ Petition since after investigation, the final report is already filed. 5.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

6.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any shall stand dismissed.

____________________ P.KESHAVA RAO, J 10th January, 2020.

gra