Ragula Ramulu, Siricilla Dt., v. The State Of Telangana, Rep Pp.,

[ 32ee ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1730 OF 2017 Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C against the Order dated 13.06.2017 in Proceedings No. C192212O17 on the file of the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Thangallapally, Rajanna Siricilla District. Between:

Ragula Ramulu, S/o. Pochaiah, aged about 50 Years, Occ Business Ryo. H.No. 2-6-106, Sanjeevaiah Nagar, Siricilla, Rajanna Siricilla District. .,.PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP. NO: 2768 0F 2017) Petition under Section 482 of Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings in Proceedings No. C192212O17 dated: 13.06.20'17 issued by the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Thangallapally, Rajanna Siricilla District, pending disposal of the Criminal Revision Case and pass such or other order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. JAYASREE Represented SRI C. DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: SRI VIZARATH ALl, ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.173O OF 2o17 ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 4g2 of Cr.P.C, aggrieved by the show cause notice issued to the petitioner under Section 1O7 of Cr.P.C by the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, Thangallapally, Rajanna Siricilla District in Proceedings No.C/922 /2OI7 dated j,3.06.2OtT.

2. Ms. Jayasree, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the subject matter of the case does not survive and no further orders are required in the present case. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case as infructuous.

3.

Mr. Vizarath Ali learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent State takes no objection to the same.

4.

Recording the submission made by both the learned counsel this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

SD/. B. SATYAV THI DEPUTY REGI //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To,

1. The Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate' ThangallaPallY, Rajanna Sircilla District

2. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Siricilla'

3. The Station House Officer' Siricilla Police Station' Rajanna Siricilla District' 41 "One CC to Sri C. Damodar Reddy' Advocate [OPUC] 5TWoCCstothePublicProsecutor,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad lOUTl

6. Two CD CoPies Gbr GJP rt-

HIGH COURT DATED:1611112023

ORDER

CRL.R.C.N o.1730 ol 2017 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS t ccgleE \o,/ "{"P