G. Rajendra Babu v. The State Of Telangana

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.1 0 4 8 3 of 2 0 1 8 & I A.Nos.2 an d 3 of 2 0 1 8 ORDER:

I A.No.2 an d 3 of 2 0 1 8 :

The applications are filed seeking permission to compromise the matter and to record the compromise entered into by the parties and quash the proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No.8 of 2017 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. 2.

The parties, together, with their respective counsel, are present in the Court and on being specifically asked, both the parties confirm the terms of compromise as recorded in the joint memo appended to the application in IA.No.3 of 2018.

3.

The terms of the compromise show that at the instance of elders of both families, the first petitioner and the second respondent settled their disputes outside the Court; in pursuance thereof solved their disputes permanently by entering into a compromise; that the second respondent is withdrawing the criminal proceedings instituted against the petitioners and the second respondent has no objection for quashing of the proceedings in C.C.No.8 of 2017 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Since, I am satisfied that the aforesaid compromise is executed by the parties out of their free will and they confirm the terms thereof, when being specifically asked, there is no impediment in recording the said compromise.

The applications are accordingly allowed.

CRLP.No.1 0 6 9 9 of 2 0 1 8 :

In view of the above, the criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.8 of 2017 on the file of the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, against the petitioners, who are A1 to A5, are hereby quashed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________ T. RAJANI, J October 5, 2018 DSK