Y.Mohan And Another v. The State Of Ap., And Another
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10426 OF 2013 Between:
1. Y.Mohan S/o Y.Prakash occ: Govt.Service R/o Sri Venkateshwara Nivas 10-4&5 P and T Colony Dilsukhnagar Hyderabad
2. Y.Sriharsha, S/o Y.Mohan occ: B.Tech Student R/o Sri Venkateshwara Nivas 104&5 P and T Colony Dilsukhnagar Hyderabad PETITION ERS/ACC USED AND
1. TheStateof Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor High Court of AP., through SHO., Medipalli PS., Hyderabad R.R.District .. Respondent No. 1
2. P.Vijaypal Reddy, S/o P.Bala Narasimha occ: Business R/o peerjagiduda Ghatkesar Mandal R.R.District. ...RESPONOENT No.2 / COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC No.502/2013 on the file of the Court of lll Metropolitan Magistrate, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar. CRLPMP. NO: 9529 OF 2013 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings / Accused 1 and 2 in the proceedings in CC No.502/2013 on the file of the Court of lll Metropolitan Magistrate, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. R. SANKU, Advocate for the Petitioner being not present and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent. No.2 The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION N0,10426 of 2013 ORDER:
Seeking to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioners in C.C.No.SO2 of 2013 on the file of the Court of III Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, the present application is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2.
No representation on petitioners' side. There was no representation on 19.11.2021 and 10.O2.2022 also. Though the matter is listed on this day under the caption "for dismissal", yet, there is no representation. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if ant., shall stand closed Sd/.N.CHANDRASEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISIFAR //rRUE coPY'
sEcrtoN ffi'* To, \
1. The lll Metropolitan Magistrate , Ranga Reddy Diskict at L B Nagar'
2. The Station House Officer, Medipalli Police Station, Hyderabad'
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana (OUT)
4. One CC to SRl. S. R. SANKU, Advocate [OPUC]
5. One CC to SRl. O. RAMESH, Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CD Copies
7. One Spare Copy \ }-
HIGH COURT DATED:03/0312022
ORDER
CRLP.No.10426 of 2013 T s c- { r I ll?
O FOR NON PROSECU'TION, ,&, DISMISSlNG THE CRL.PE'TITION @*(* ')/ "