B. Raja Ram Singh, v. The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd., And Another,

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.2105 of 2013 & I .A.No.1 of 2018 ORDER:

I .A.No.1 of 2018 This application is filed requesting the Court to record the compromise entered into by the parties and quash the proceedings against the petitioner/A3 in C.C.No.193 of 2011 on the file of IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad.

2.

The parties, together, with their respective counsel, are present in the Court and on being specifically asked, both the parties confirm the terms of compromise as recorded in the joint memorandum of compromise appended to the applications. 3.

The terms of the compromise show that a settlement was arrived between the petitioner and the second respondent and the same was reduced into writing and signed by both parties and in view of the same, the second respondent has no objection for quashing of the proceedings, against the petitioner/A3 in C.C.No.193 of 2011 on the file of IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad. Since, I am satisfied that the aforesaid compromise is executed by the parties out of their free will and they confirm the terms thereof, when being specifically asked, there is no impediment in recording the said compromise. The application is accordingly allowed.

CRLP.No.2105 of 2013:

In view of the above, the criminal petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner/A3 in C.C.No.193 of 2011 on the file of IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ______________ T. RAJANI , J 04th December, 2018 KSM

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.2105 of 2013 & I .A.No.1 of 2018 04th December, 2018 KSM