← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/884/2013dismissed

Koti Anji Reddy, v. E.Laxmi Reddy, And 2 Others,

2024-09-27K.Surender3 pages

r !

- [ 3251 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENW SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANO AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMIN AL REVISION CASE NO: 884OF 20'13 Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 & zt01 of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated 20-02-2013 made in Crl.MP.No.341 ol 2013 in CC.No'824 ot 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad, Preferred against the Order passed in Crl- tvlP-No.4O19 fo 2O12 in CC.No.824 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the lV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Hyderabad.

Between:

Koti Anji Reddy, S/o Late K.Laxma Reddy, Occ Retd. Government Servant (Addl. Directoi), Civil Supplies Departments. Rlo 14-621G, Snehanagar Colony, Habsiguda, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER i AND I I E.Laxmi Reddy, S/o Ella Reddy, Occ Asst. Director, O/o The Commissioner of Civil Supplies,-Hyderabad, R/o Door No.2-1-452, Flat No.203, Pushpanjali Residdency, Street No.5, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. I I i I Smt. Endela Aruna,, Wo Endela Laxmi Reddy, Occ Housewife, R/o Door No.2-1452, Falt No.203, Pushpanjali Residency, Street No.5, Nallakunta, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED i i i I i The State of Andhra Pradesh,, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS : Sri. J Sudheer (Not Present) Counsel for the Petitioner I I I Ii : Sri Sunil Babu Vajram Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : Public Prosecutor I I Counsel for the Respondent No, 3 I i The Court made the following:

!

I :

,// THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K'SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.884 OF 2013 ORDER:

I This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated2O.O2.2O13 passed in Crl'M P'No'341 of 2013 in C.C.No.B24 of 2Ol2 by the I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad.

2.

Even after affording fair opportunities, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Perused the record. 3.

As seen from t-he record, the order passed in Crl.M.P'No 341 of 2013 in C.C.No.824 of 2Ol2 by the I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad, under Section a39Ql of Cr.P C', is interlocutory in nature. Since the interlocutory orders are prohibited from the jurisdiction of filing of Revision under Section 397 (2\ of Cr.P.C, the present Revision case is not maintainable' 4.

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// , \,v.

SECTIOffOFFICER To,

1. The I Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge at Hyderabad (with records' if .any-) z. rne tv Additional chief Metropolitan Mlgistrate Hyderabad (with records, if any) Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT) One CC to Sri. J Sudheer, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Sunil Babu Vajram, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies (k DL/gh

HIGH COURT DATED:2710912024 i.{ s14 r{.

o al -) a () 1? |,EE 2024

ORDER

,).,.

{ CRLRC.No.884 of 2013 Dr o iii% icHt:

-:=: =:

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE.

aa co!ft4 .frq