K.Manemma v. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Apcpdcl

[ 321e 1 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 25140 OF 2011 Between:

K. Manemma, Wo.K. Naganna, Occ: Household, Rl/o. H. No.8 -2-293lB2lDlF I Jl 1 B' Durga Bhavani Nagar, Film Nagar, Hyderabad.

...'ET'T'ONER AND The Assistant Divisional Engineer, APCPDCL, Road No.'1 , Banjara Hills, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not disposing of petitioner representations dated 22.3.2011 and 18.8.201 1 as illegal' arbitrary, and violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioner under Article 14 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent to make correction in the electricity bills thereby removing the illegally demanded amount of Rs.27,2901-.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NOilQgz5 oF 2011) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent not to disconnect electricity supply to petitioner house under consumer No.A9021 104 thereby allowing her to pay normal electricity bills J regularly to the respondent without insisting on payment of Rs.27 '2901- pending disposal of the present writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M.A. MUJEEB Counsel for the Respondents: SRt R. VINOD REDDY (SC FOR TSSPDCL) The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DE\II WRIT PETITION No.25l4O of 2011 ORDER:

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

2. On going through the prayer in the writ petition, it is noticed that the main prayer is to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 22.03.2011 and 18.08.2011. It is noticed that this Court in W.P.M.P.No.30925 of 2011, dated 22.09.2011, had directed the respondent to consider the representations of the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders thereon and till such time not to disconnect the power supply.

3. In view of the above, there does not seem to be any further orders necessary in this writ petition, therefore, this writ !i I I petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. i I Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand l closed.

SD/- K.SREERAMAMURTY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIOIfuTFrcER To,

1. One

2. One

3. Two CHR ADK CC to Sri M.A. Mujeeb Advocate [OPUC] QQ !o Sf R. Vinod Reddy, SC FoR TSSPDCL tOpUCl CD Copies BS6

HIGH COURT DATE D : 1 510312023

ORDER

S W.P.No.25140 ot 2011 \:

1 g APfi ?023 J ,|) 1'_ i I CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS 5t'5\n\, I iI I I