Siraj, v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.16027 of 2025 DATE: 08.12.2025 BETWEEN:

Siraj .....petitioner/accused And The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, Hyderabad.

.....Respondent/complainant

ORDER

This criminal petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') by the petitioner/accused seeking enlargement on bail in connection with Crime No.708 of 2025 of Attapur Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. The offences alleged

against the petitioner are under Sections 109(1) r/w 3(5) of the BNS.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that on 27.08.2025, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that the complainant is running the Starf Furniture Shop and since two months back a person by name Ayaz open the Patel Furniture Shop nearby his shop and the complainant brother by name Aizaz informed the same to the complainant and the complainant along with his brother and his relative person went to the shop and asked him about the issue, but the accused persons beat them with their hands and the accused No.3 beat the complainant's own brother on his head with Iron rod. As a result, he received bleeding injuries. Hence, he requested for necessary action. Basing on the said complaint, the police registered a case for the above said offences. 3.

Heard Sri S. M. Saifullah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the alleged offences and he is no way

connected with the alleged incident. He further submitted that accused Nos.1 to 4 granted bail by this Court and that the material part of the investigation was completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this Criminal Petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the injured witnesses sustained grievous injuries and the investigation was not yet completed and prayed to dismiss this petition.

6.

Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel and the material on record, the petitioner is in jail from 19.11.2025 and as seen from the record, LWs 1 to 10 were already examined during the investigation and there are cases and counter cases lodged by the parties against each other. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration of petitioner in jail, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

i.

The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned XXV Additional Judicial Magistrate, at Rajendra Nagar.

ii.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Wednesday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 483(2) of BNSS.

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 08.12.2025 SAI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.16027 of 2025 Date: 08.12.2025 SAI