High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/1848/2015disposed of no costs

V.Srikanth, v. Puduru Ashwini

2015-09-02T.Sunil Chowdary2 pages

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Crl.R.C.No.1848 of 2015

ORDER

The present criminal revision case is directed against the order dated 25.06.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.21 of 2015 in M.C.No.333 of 2014 by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Casecum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad.

2. Heard both sides.

3. During the pendency of M.C.No.333 of 2014, the first and second respondents being the wife and son of petitioner filed Crl.M.P.21 of 2015 claiming interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.10,000/-per month each to them. The trial Court having found that the petitioner is having sufficient means and willfully neglected and refused to provide minimum necessities to his wife and son, granted interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.6,000/- and Rs.4,000/-per month to the first and second respondents from the date of the petition till disposal of the maintenance case. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the present revision.

4. The relationship between the parties is not in dispute. The trial Court, after taking the various circumstances into consideration, granted the said interim maintenance to the first and second respondents. Apparently, the order impugned is an interim in nature. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on merits of the matter, the trial Court is directed to dispose of M.C.No.333 of

2014 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such time, the petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- and Rs.2,000/-per month to the first and second respondents towards interim maintenance on or before 10th of every succeeding month. The petitioner is further directed to pay the arrears, if any, to the first and second respondents calculating at the rate fixed by this Court in three equal monthly installments commencing from the month of October, 2015. The payments, if any made, have to be adjusted accordingly. The trial Court shall dispose of the said M.C. on merits without being influenced by the observations of this Court.

5. With the above said modification of the impugned order, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in this revision, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 2nd September, 2015 sj