← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaAS/625/2002

Gali Sridhara Vandanam v. N. Kiran Kumar

2016-04-25M.Satyanarayana Murthy1 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY A.S.M.P.No.825 of 2016 & A.S.No.625 of 2002 COMMON JUDGMENT:- Both the parties are present and they are identified by their respective counsel.

The contents of the memorandum of compromise are read over to the parties and they admitted that they voluntarily entered into the compromise and terms of compromise are true.

In view of the compromise arrived between the parties, I find that it is a fit case to record the compromise by exercising power under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, A.S.M.P.No.825 of 2016 is ordered. In view of the orders passed in A.S.M.P. No.825 of 2016, the Appeal Suit stands disposed of in terms of the memorandum of compromise. The Registry is directed to annex a copy of the memorandum of compromise to the decree.

Pending miscellaneous petitions in this Appeal, if any, shall stand closed in consequence. No order as to costs. ___________________________ M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J 25th April, 2016 Bvv