Gadide Govindraj v. The State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTTCE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10757 OF 2018 Between:
1. Gadide Govindraj, S/o Sripathi Rao, aged 40 years, Occ. Agriculture,
2. Gadide Sheshikala, Wo Govindraj, aged 45 years, Occ. Agriculture,
3. Devkathe Santosi, W/o Kishor, aged 25 years, Occ. House hold,
4. Devkathe Uttam, S/o Baliram, aged 29 years, Occ. Agriculture, All the above are the residents of H.No.1-106, Akulawargalli, Madnur village and Mandal Dist. Nizamabad.
..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 to 3 & 5 AND T.he State of Telangana, Represented by its public prosecutor, High court, Hyderabad.
Devkathe Namdev, S/o Dhanraj, aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Takiguda village, Mandal Gudihathnur, Diatrict Adilabad: ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash c.c.No.257 of 2016 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial First class Magistrate at utnoor and consequentially all proceedings emanating from the same.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under section 482 ot cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings emanating from C.C.NO. 2S7 oF 2016 on the file of the Honorable Judicial First class Magistrate at Utnoor. l
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Paidi Krishna Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D,NAGARJUN CRIMINAL PETITION No.1O757 of 2O18 ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitioners - accused Nos.l to 3 and 5 to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No.257 of 2016 on the file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate at Utnoor registered for the offence under Sections 447,324,506 read with Section 34 ofthe Indian Penal Code. 2.
No representation on behalf of the petitioners 3.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has submitted that subsequent to filing of the criminal petition, the parties to the dispute have settled the matter before the Lok Adalath on 23.12.2018 and accordingly the trial Court has disposed of the case and to that extent letter dated 15.07.2O22 addressed by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Neredmet Police Station to the Public Prosecutor of the High Court is filed. 4.
In view of the above submissions, since the main case has already been disposed of, the very purpose of filing the criminal petition to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.257 of 2O16 on the file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate at Utnoor has
) already been defeated and thereby the criminal petition has become infructuous and liabie to be dismissed. 5.
Accordingly, the infructuous.
Criminal petition is dismissed AS As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
SDIN. RAJ GOPAL ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// & SECTION OFFICER To, 1 . The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Utnoor.
2. The Station House Ofiicer, lndervelly Police Station, Adilabad District.
3. One CC to Sri Paidi Krishna Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
5. Two CD Copies
6. One Spare Copy obr "tl4
HIGH COURT DATED: 2610812022
ORDER
1 itE s 14 i( N* ?"\fri -, !l ,i' ,J CRLP.No.10757 ot 2018 24 Nuv 2W I I DISMISSING THE CRL.P AS INFRUCTUOUS l!