← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/34845/2015disposed of no costs

Elavala Krishnaveni v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

2015-10-27Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * WRIT PETIITON No. 34845 of 2015 BETWEEN E.Krishnaveni ... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary and others ...RESPONDENTS DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 27.08.2015 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR 1.

Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

No 2.

Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

No 3.

Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

No ORDER:

Petitioner states that she has executed a sale deed on 06.11.2014 relating to the lands in survey Nos.170-C, 170-D, 267-4B, 268-1B & 268-1C of Veligandla Village of Kondapuram Mandal of SPSR Nellore District, but the fifth respondent is stated to have refused to receive the said document and process the same. Questioning the action of the fifth respondent in not receiving and process the document, the present writ petition is filed.

2. Since the registering authority cannot refuse to receive the document and process the same even before presentation, the fifth respondent is directed to receive and process the document to be presented by the petitioner. The fifth respondent is further directed to receive and process the document in accordance with the Registration Act, 1908 and the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and if the document is in conformity with the provisions of the aforesaid enactments, thereafter, register and release the document in accordance with the due procedure. It is also made clear that in the event of the fifth respondent not being satisfied with the compliance under the Registration Act, or the Stamp Act, appropriate refusal endorsement together with reasons shall be recorded and communicated to the petitioner in terms of Section 71 of the Registration Act.

The writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J October 27, 2015 LMV