← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC/725/2014closed no costs

Cherukuri Seethararnamma v. Dr.C.R.P.S. Krishna,

2023-01-25C.V. Bhaskar Reddy4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 725 OF 2014 Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents herein for violating the Order of the Court in W.P.M.P.NO. 34286 of 2009 in W.P.No.9B69 of 2009 dated 15.'12.2009 Between:

Cherukuri Seetharamamma, D/o. Ch.Kotaiah, aged about 89 years (Senior Citizen), Ri/o.H.No.6-12-47 Ganesh Basthi; Kothagudem Town & Mandal Khammam District.

...PETITIONEFYPETITIONER AND

1. Dr.C.R.P.S. Krishna, S/o. Jai Bhanudu Sri Lalitha Padmavathi Nursing Home R:/o. Ganesh Basthi, Kothagudem Town & Mandal Khammam District.

2. Dr. K. Padmavathi, Wo. Dr.C.R.P.S. Krishna Sri Lalitha Padmavathi Nursing Home Rl/o. Ganesh Basthi, Kothagudem Town & Mandal Khammam District. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VEDULA SRINIVAS (not Present) ss\ Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 and 2 : PRABHAKAR SRIPADA The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE C. V. BHASKAR REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.725 of2014 ORDER:

The Contempt Case has been filed for violation of the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.M.P. No.34286 ol 2009 in W.P. No.9869 of 2OO9 dated 15.t2.2009.

2. By the aforesaid order dated 15.12.2009, this Court directed respondent Nos.4 to 5 in the writ petition t not to construct second floor, in as much as the application filed by them was rejected by the 3.d respondent-Kothagudem Municipality. Alleging violation of the said order, present Contempt Case has been instituted. Flowever, the Contempt Case filed by the petitioner has not been admitted so far.

3. When the case was listed on 17 .11.2022, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, thr' matter was directed to be listed on

l 22.1L2O22 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also, there is no representation on behaLf of the petitioner.

4. The Contempt Case is, accordingly, closed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to take appropriate action in accordance with law if any cause survives in the Contempt Case. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending in the contempt case, sha1l also stand closed. Sd/.K.SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR ;

SECTION OFFICER To, \ //TRUE COPY//

1. Dr.C.R.P.S. Krishna, S/o. Jai Bhanudu Sri Lalitha Padmavathi Nursing Home R/o. Ganesh Basthi, Kothagudem Town & Mandal Khammarn District.

2. Dr.K. Padmavathi, W/o. Dr.C.R.P.S. Krishna Sri Lalitha Padmavathi Nursing Home Rl/o. Ganesh Basthi, Kothagudem Town & Mandal Khammam District.

3. One CC to SRl. VEDULA SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to SRl. PRABHAKAR SRIPADA, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies pr ?

HIGH COURT CVBR,J DATED:2510112023 1 SE STA [ 2 fil!] ?li] a \i o t.) !l '!

l.l

ORDER

\:: -- CC.No.725 ot 2O14 CONTEMPT CASE IS CLOSED WITHOUT COSTS f+)"r''x - B"z-- -....^ caVB'