← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/4690/2002dismissed

Pilli Mahesh, Karimnagar District. v. The District Malaria And Fhealth Officer, Karimnagar.

2018-07-26Abhinand Kumar Shavili3 pages

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO.4690 OF 2002 ORDER:

1.

This writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the order dated 27.11.2000 in I.D.No.125 of 1996 on the file of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Godavarikhani,, and to quash the same by declaring it as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently, to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits.

2.

Heard Sri K. Jagadishwar Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Medical Health and Family Welfare appearing for respondents Nos.1 and 2. 3.

It has been submitted by the petitioner that he was initially engaged on daily wage basis during 1991 and he was continued till 1994 and thereafter his services were illegally terminated and in those set of circumstances, he raised an industrial dispute by filing I.D.No.125 of 1996 before the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act and the learned Tribunal has erroneously dismissed the I.D. vide order dated 27.11.2000 and challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed.

It has been contended by the petitioner that

many of his juniors were continued and their services were regularized, but his services were illegally terminated. 4.

The learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents Nos.1 and 2 contended that the Industrial Tribunal rightly dismissed the I.D. as the petitioner has not completed 240 days of service, and therefore, the order of the learned Tribunal does not warrant any interference by this Court.

5.

This Court having considered the rival submissions made by the parties is of the view that the learned Tribunal has considered the entire case of the petitioner and came to a conclusion that the petitioner had not worked for 240 days within twelve months prior to his removal from service. This Court does not find any irregularity or perversity in the order passed by the learned Tribunal. 6.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.

_____________________________ (ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J) Dated: 26th July, 2018 Nn

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO.4690 OF 2002 Dated: 26.7.2018 Nn