Mohd.Azeem@ Mohd.Jahangir Md.Imad @ Ajju Jabri v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.16637 of 2025 DATE: 19.12.2025 Between:

Mohd. Azeem .... Petitioner/accused AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

.... Respondent ORDER:

This criminal petition is filed by the petitioner/accused seeking enlargement on bail in Crime No.995 of 2025 of Mailardevpally Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) and 69 of the BNS, 2023.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that, on 21.10.2025, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that she was acquainted with the petitioner herein in the month of June and thereafter, the petitioner herein promised her to marry and took her to the flat of the petitioner and she also trusted him that he will marry her and under the promise of marriage, he exploited her physically and also took cash of Rs.30,45,000/- from her and after that the petitioner refused to marry her. Hence, she requested for necessary action. Basing on the same, the police registered a case for the above said offences.

3.

Heard Sri Mohammed Nadeem, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and there is no such promise of marriage and he is falsely implicated in this case and he is in jail since 22.10.2025 and the entire investigation is completed and prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the allegations against the petitioner are serious in nature and not only that, under the promise of marriage, he took cash of Rs.30,45,000/- from the de-facto complainant, therefore, he is not entitled for the bail and prayed to dismiss this petition.

6.

Having regard to the submissions made by both the learned counsel and the material on record, the petitioner herein is in jail since 22.10.2025 and as seen from the record, LWs 1 to 13 witnesses were already examined including the investigating authority.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the period of incarceration of petitioner in jail, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned XII Judicial Magistrate of First Class, R.R. District, at Rajendranagar.

ii.

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 483(2) of BNSS.

7.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 19.12.2025 TU

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.16637 2025 Date:19.12.2025 TU